By R.J. Morales | TX3DNews.com
As U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities spark global headlines, voices in Texas’ 3rd Congressional District are weighing in—raising constitutional questions, foreign policy concerns, and local stakes for military families.
Collin County Democrats Oppose Unilateral Action
Jeremy Sutka, Chair of the Collin County Democratic Party, released a statement on June 23 denouncing the U.S. airstrikes on Iran as unconstitutional and reckless.
“No one individual should have the power to unilaterally send American service members into harm’s way. Military action must be lawful, deliberate, and accountable to the people through their elected representatives,” Sutka said.
He called the strike a breach of the constitutional process and reaffirmed the party’s opposition to any new wars not approved by Congress. Sutka warned that bypassing legislative oversight not only undermines democratic norms but also creates a dangerous precedent for future presidents of either party.
“Democracy is not strengthened through unchecked power,” Sutka added. “It is preserved through adherence to the rule of law.”
The CCDP’s statement reflects concerns shared by many in the district who have family members in the military. With many Collin County residents deployed or stationed at U.S. bases across the Middle East, decisions made without open debate can carry immediate and personal consequences.
Adding to the local response, Evan Hunt—U.S. Air Force veteran and Democratic candidate for TX‑03—called the conflict “a result of reckless decisions and presidential tweets” in a video posted to social media. His remarks echoed calls for greater accountability and deliberation before engaging in military action.
By highlighting the lack of a congressional vote, the CCDP is drawing renewed attention to the broader debate over war powers—specifically, whether any president should have the authority to launch a major military operation without input from Congress.
Rep. Keith Self’s Response on X
Rep. Keith Self posted a series of statements defending the strikes, framing them as a necessary response to Iran’s nuclear activity rather than a provocation. In his messaging, he emphasized deterrence and denied any intent for regime change:
“We’re not seeking war with the Iranian people—we’re confronting Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Regime change is not the objective of the United States.”
He also issued a warning:
“Iran, take heed: Any retaliation will be met with the unmatched strength of the United States Military—the world’s most formidable fighting force.”
In a June 22 interview with Newsmax’s Sunday Agenda,
which Self shared on X, he expressed strong support for President Trump’s decision to bypass a formal congressional declaration of war:
“I don’t think that Congress has the DNA to pass a declaration of war… anytime soon. It won’t happen. He knew that.”
Self argued that Trump acted within his authority, citing precedent:
“Several presidents before him, a long lineage, have done exactly the same thing.”
He further dismissed critics of the strike, suggesting that assertive military action could prevent a prolonged conflict:
“Do they want to keep sending young Americans into the desert to bleed and die with no resolution? This is how we used to fight wars. We defeat our enemy, our adversaries.”
Taken together, Self’s remarks reflect unambiguous support for the president’s decision to act unilaterally. Rather than questioning executive overreach, Self framed the action as consistent with historical precedent and necessary for national security.
Why This Matters in TX‑03
For residents of TX‑03, the implications of the U.S. strikes on Iran extend beyond foreign policy. Many families in the district have connections to the military, including service members deployed across the Middle East, where the risk of retaliation remains elevated.
The absence of a congressional vote has raised concerns among legal scholars and some constituents about the long-term balance of power between Congress and the executive branch. At the same time, other voters in the district support the strikes, citing Iran’s record of anti-American rhetoric and regional hostility. For them, the operation is seen as a justified and necessary deterrent.
Large-scale military campaigns also carry significant fiscal costs, which could influence future federal spending on domestic priorities such as infrastructure, education, and veterans’ services. As the situation evolves, constituents may increasingly look to their elected leaders for oversight, transparency, and clear communication about how and why national security decisions are made.
TX3DNews will continue monitoring this fast-moving story. Follow us for updates from our elected officials and local communities.
Want to help others stay informed?
📧 Share via Email